Consistency between POLARS and LARS scores regarding the incidence of low anterior resection syndrome in a Chilean population undergoing rectal surgery secondary to cancer in a high-volume hospital.

AIM: The aim of this work was to evaluate the concordance between the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and preoperative LARS (POLARS) scores regarding the incidence of LARS in a Chilean population undergoing rectal surgery for cancer in a high-volume hospital. METHOD: The LARS score questionnaire, following telephone requests, was used to determine the presence and severity of LARS. The POLARS score was calculated based on variables described previously. Correlations and qualitative and quantitative concordance were evaluated using Spearman's correlation coefficient, the kappa coefficient and the Bland-Altman plot with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients met the inclusion criteria: 37.5% underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy, 61% underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) and 51.6% underwent ostomy. A total of 49% of patients did not present with LARS, whereas 28% had major LARS. The correlation between scales was poor, with a fair qualitative concordance to determine the presence/absence of LARS and a slight qualitative concordance to determine the degree of the intensity. The quantitative concordance was poor. CONCLUSION: In the Chilean population, concordance between the LARS and POLARS scores was qualitatively fair to determine the presence/absence of the disease and qualitatively slight to determine the degree of intensity. We do not suggest using the POLARS score in the perioperative period in the Chilean population deliberately, as the score may help to determine the presence/absence of LARS but cannot determine its degree of intensity. Additional evaluations are required to determine the factors contributing to the degree of agreement between the scales.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: outcomes, functional results, and quality of life in patients with more than 10-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the surgical procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). IPAA was incorporated into our institution in 1984, and thereafter, more than 200 procedures have been performed. The functional results and morbidity of this surgery have been reported previously. However, long-term functional outcomes and quality of life have not been evaluated. METHODS: As a cohort study, we identified all consecutive patients who underwent IPAA for UC between 1984 and 2017 and selected those with more than 10-year follow-up. Demographic data, morbidity, and pouch survival information were obtained. Long-term functional results and quality of life were evaluated through an e-mail survey using the Öresland score and the Cleveland Global Quality of Life scales, respectively. RESULTS: Of 201 patients, 116 met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 20 (10-34) years. Early post-operative complications (30 days) were observed in 19 (16.4%) patients and 66 (56.9%) presented adverse events. The IPAA preservation rate at 10 and 20 years was 96.5% and 93.1%, respectively. Long-term functional scores presented a median of 6 (1-15) points. IPAA function was satisfactory in 11 (20.0%) patients, acceptable in 18 (32.7%), and deficient in 26 (47.3%). The median score for global quality of life was 0.8 (0.23-1.0) points. CONCLUSION: IPAA as treatment for UC meets the expectations of cure of the disease, maintaining adequate long-term intestinal functionality associated with a good quality of life in most patients.